3 Jun
2014
3 Jun
'14
10:26 p.m.
On 6/3/2014 3:05 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Victor Stinner
wrote: 2014-06-03 23:38 GMT+02:00 Chris Angelico
: Is this an intentional change? And if so, is it formally documented somewhere? I don't recall seeing anything about it, but my recollection doesn't mean much. Yes, it's intentional. See the issue for the rationale: http://bugs.python.org/issue19995 Thanks! I'll fix (in this case, simply remove) the test and cite that issue.
Wouldn't it be better to keep the test, but expect the operation to fail?