Le lundi 28 février 2011 à 13:56 -0600, Benjamin Peterson a écrit :
2011/2/28 Antoine Pitrou email@example.com:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:36:11 -0500 Terry Reedy firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
- an existing branch. The pusher then has to merge the superfetatory heads
'superfetatory'? I have no idea of what this is, neither does merriam-webster.com ;-).
There are some Google hits, though... Not sure if they are of people making the same mistakes as I do ;)
Endly, perhaps it will be adopted. Did you mean "superfluous" though?
I really meant superfetatory (it's slightly different: superfluous is simply useless, while superfetatory implies that it's in excess).