Steve Holden wrote:
Anthony Baxter wrote:
On Friday 08 September 2006 18:24, Steve Holden wrote:
I agree it's a relatively large patch for a release candidate but if prudence suggests deferring it, it should be a *definite* for 2.5.1 and subsequent releases.
Possibly. I remain unconvinced.
But it *is* a desirable, albeit new, feature, so I'm surprised that you don't appear to perceive it as such for a downstream release.
And unlike 2.2's True/False problem, it is an *environmental* feature, rather than a programmatic one. So while it's a new feature, it would merely mean that 2.5.1 works correctly in more environments than 2.5. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.boredomandlaziness.org