29 May
2002
29 May
'02
2:42 p.m.
"GvR" == Guido van Rossum
writes:
GvR> Or maybe we could introduce a new warning category, GvR> SilentDeprecationWarning, which is normally ignored (like GvR> OverflowWarning already is). This could be turned on GvR> explicitly with a -W option so someone wanting to check that GvR> their code is future-proof would have an easy way to do so. +1 -Barry