21 Feb
2001
21 Feb
'01
7:11 a.m.
Even at the cost of additional implementation complexity?
I can only assume you are serious. IMO, absolutely!
Let's not waffle.
Agreed. IMO we are starting to waffle the minute we ignore backwards compatibility. If a new feature can't be added without breaking code that was not previously documented as illegal, then IMO it is simply a non-starter until Py3k. Indeed, I seem to recall many worthwhile features being added to the Py3k bit-bucket for exactly that reason. Mark.