On 14/08/2020 3:36 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 12:32 AM Mark Shannon firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
I've written up a critique of PEP 622. Rather than dump a 2000 line email on you all, I've made a git repo.
I started reading it. You're saying the same things that everyone else has said, so I stopped reading.
I've added an abstract and made the analysis of the standard library more prominent. Would you take another look and let me know if it is more a compelling read now?
Do you have anything new to add to the discussion, or is this 2000 lines of rehash?
Do let me know whether you think it adds anything new, once you've read a bit more.