17 Apr
2001
17 Apr
'01
11:04 p.m.
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Guido van Rossum wrote:
This is one of the reasons why I didn't want to add this to the 2.1 release at such a late point. I have no easy way to verify that this is always true, and in fact I have no idea what inspect.stack()[1][3] means. :-(
Would you have preferred to write sys._getframe().f_back.f_code.co_name ? It's the same thing. -- ?!ng "If I have seen farther than others, it is because I was standing on a really big heap of midgets." -- K. Eric Drexler