Clay repeatedly pointed out that other people have objected to ipaddr and been ignored. It's really, really disappointing to see you continue to ignore not only them, but the repeated attempts Clay has made to point them out.
[I meant to stop discussing here, but I just want comment on this remark]
I had seen objections from Victor Stinner, which I did not fully understand, but he seemed to be saying that he is ok with including ipaddr. I had also seen objections from David Moss, which he then seems to have withdrawn. I did not take your message (msg78675 in the tracker) as an objection - you just seemed to express a preference to use netaddr instead. You said it had minor quirks, and some of them have to be removed - but I would not infer that the library should be exclude because of these minor quirks.
I don't have time to argue this issue, but I agree with essentially everything Clay has said in this thread, and I commented about these problems on the ticket months ago, before ipaddr was added.
I now understand (but honestly didn't understand before) that you are objecting to ipaddr's inclusion, and that you would prefer its removal at this point.