On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:43, Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote:
Brett Cannon wrote:
This is somewhat covered by components, but it's implicit. Would it be worth making this explicit? I have always wondered if people would be more willing to help out if they could easily search for pure Python code issues if that is as far as they feel comfortable.
If and when I am ready to move from working on documentation issues (which seem to becoming fewer as the 3.x transition is completed) to code issues, that would be helpful. What would be really helpful is to have library issues tagged and sorted by specific modules (or modules, if more than one), but I do not know how that might be done.
It would have to be a text field that people just filled in. Making a list that had to be kept up-to-date would be a disaster. But one would hope that simply searching for an issue with a specific module name would be enough to warrant not having to have the field. -Brett