j: Next unread message
k: Previous unread message
j a: Jump to all threads
j l: Jump to MailingList overview
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
someone really needs to fuse the patch manager with roundup (that we should use roundup for bug tracking goes without saying...)
How sweet! Why, thank you. :)
Trent Mick wrote:
What are the chances of getting other meta data fields on patches, i.e. changes to the patch manager? Categorizing patches could really help as a filter. For instance, I may be a Unicode genius and would like to see the patches associated with it.
I agree that doing that kind of filtering is very useful. I have a discussion thingie (based on Roundup) at http://headspaces.com/. (Also prototype -- very prototype.) I hacked out the "status" and "fixer" fields and added a "keywords" field. Not much volume yet, but i think it will work well.
Perhaps something like that for discussing patches?
Jeremy Hylton wrote:
Maybe the right solution is to work with the SourceForge maintainers to make roundup part of the standard support software.
Hmmm... maybe i should look into that after i've figured out how super-Roundup is going to work.