On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 15:19, David Mertz <mertz@gnosis.cx> wrote:
As a candidate for the new SC, if elected I would certainly find it more useful to have more specific thoughts from the outgoing SC than simply "we recommend." How divided was the vote? Who took the sides? What were the major points of disagreement? That sort of thing.
My understanding was that the outgoing SC would fully brief the new SC. The mail here is simply a summary view for the information of the wider python-dev community. Personally, I'm not sure how I feel about it. It's very much a good thing in terms of transparency, something the SC seems to still be trying to find the right balance on, but I feel that having seen this, I'd be left with a lot of unanswered questions if the incoming SC ends up rejecting the proposal, and therefore I don't really know how to view the information with that context. Paul