On Nov 12, 2009, at 5:23 PM, Masklinn wrote:
On Nov 12, 2009, at 4:11 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
I think Jesse's point (or, if he's not willing to claim it, my point) is that, compared to the mandatory comment system, it makes much *more* sense to have a mandatory field for “URL to the BTS for this project”.
One might look at the "competition" for inspiration. Looking at CPAN. There's no "comments" feature There is, on search.cpan.org. See http://search.cpan.org/~petdance/ack/ for instance, the link leads to http://cpanratings.perl.org/ (a
On 12 Nov 2009, at 22:53 , James Y Knight wrote: pretty interesting example of the "distributed" nature of cpan in fact).
Ah, I see. I totally managed to miss that...I guess that's an interesting example of a bad web ui. :) James