![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/047f2332cde3730f1ed661eebb0c5686.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Jan. 31, 2003
6:45 p.m.
From: "Guido van Rossum" <guido@python.org>
So the compiler cannot look at what the thunk is used for. We need uniform treatment of all thunks. (Even if it means that the thunk's consumer has to work a little harder.)
is it a correct assumption that generalized thunks be it, and so argumenting against them is wasting my time?
Not at all. This is still wide open. I happen to like generalized thunks because they remind me of Ruby blocks. But I realize there are more ways to skin this cat. Keep it coming! And remember, I'm arguing in my spare time. :-) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)