27 Mar
2012
27 Mar
'12
12:35 p.m.
Yury Selivanov wrote:
On 2012-03-27, at 9:23 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
time.try_monotonic() # Monotonic is preferred, but non-monotonic presents a tolerable risk
This function seems unnecessary. It's easy to implement it when required in your application, hence I don't think it is worth adding to the stdlib.
If I understood Nick correctly, time.try_monotonic() is /for/ the stdlib. If others want to make use of it, fine. If others want to make their own fallback mechanism, also fine. ~Ethan~