21 Apr
2020
21 Apr
'20
9:02 a.m.
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 7:25 AM Victor Stinner
Would it make sense to start by adding the module as a private "_subinterpreters" module but document it? The "_" prefix would be a reminder that "hey! it's experimental, there is a no backward compatibility warranty there".
I would expect a leading underscore to be confusing (as well as conflicting with the name of the low-level module). if we did anything then it would probably make more sense to name the module something like "interpreters_experimental". However, I'm not sure that offers that much benefit.
We can also add a big warning in the documentation.
We will mark it "provisional" in the docs, which I expect will include info on what that means and why it is provisional. -eric