On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Antoine Pitrou
On Thu, 4 May 2017 11:24:27 +0900 INADA Naoki
wrote: Hi, Nick and all core devs who are interested in this PEP.
I'm reviewing PEP 538 and I want to accept it in this month. It will reduces much UnicodeError pains which server-side OPs facing. Thank you Nick for working on this PEP.
If you have something worrying about this PEP, please post a comment soon. If you don't have enough time to read entire this PEP, feel free to ask a question about you're worrying.
From my POV, it is problematic that the behaviour outlined in PEP 538 (see Abstract section) varies depending on the adoption of another PEP (PEP 540).
If we want to adopt PEP 538 before pronouncing on PEP 540, then PEP 538 should remove all points conditional on PEP 540 adoption, and PEP 540 should later be changed to adopt those removed points as PEP 540-specific changes.
Regards
Antoine.
Fair enough. I stop hurrying about PEP 538 and start reviewing PEP 540. Thanks,