April 22, 2018
9:32 a.m.
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 7:29 PM, Christoph Groth <christoph@grothesque.org> wrote:
If I had to choose between the above and ":= binding expressions", I guess I would tend to prefer the latter because they are sufficient, nicer looking and offer less potential for trouble. But I think that it is worth to fully discuss the above idea as well. IMHO it should be at least briefly mentioned in the "rejected ideas" of PEP 572, because it is arguably the most self-evident way to introduce name-binding expressions into the language.
It's in the FAQ. ChrisA