On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 08:42:12AM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I'm ready to accept this PEP. Because I haven't read this entire thread
> (and 60 messages about random diversions is really too much to try and
> catch up on) I'll give people 24 hours to remind me of outstanding
> rejections.
>
> I also haven't reviewed the code in any detail, but I believe the code
> review is going well, so I'm not concerned that the PEP would have to
> revised based on that alone.

There are a couple of outstanding issues that I am aware of, but I don't
believe that either of these affect acceptance/rejection of the PEP.
Please correct me if I am wrong.

1) Implementation details of the statistics.sum function. Oscar is
giving me a lot of very valuable assistance speeding up the
implementation of sum.

2) The current implementation has extensive docstrings, but will also
need a separate statistics.rst file.


I don't recall any other outstanding issues, if I have forgotten any,
please remind me.

Those certainly don't stand in the way of the PEP's acceptance (but they do block the commit of the code :-).

The issues that Oscar listed also all seem resolved (though they would make a nice addition to the "Discussion" section in the PEP).

--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)