15 Jul
2013
15 Jul
'13
3:32 a.m.
On 15 July 2013 16:01, Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettinger@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 14, 2013, at 6:32 AM, David Beazley dave@dabeaz.com wrote:
I honestly don't have any particular thoughts about PLY vs. other parser generators and the merits of their inclusion (or not) in the standard library.
I would love to have PLY in the standard library. It would open up a whole new world to some users and be the basis for tool generation for others.
Agreed (and the fact it's a prerequisite for pycparsing and cffi just seals the deal).
Cheers, Nick.
-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia