31 Jan
2001
31 Jan
'01
12:24 a.m.
"NS" == Neil Schemenauer <nas@arctrix.com> writes:
NS> What's the chances of getting generators into 2.2? The NS> implementation should not be hard. Didn't Steven Majewski NS> have something years ago? Why do we always get sidetracked on NS> trying to figure out how to do coroutines and continuations? I'd be +1 on someone wrestling PEP 220 from Gordon's icy claws, renaming it just "Generators" and filling it out for the 2.2 time frame. If we want to address coroutines and continuations later, we can write separate PEPs for them. Send me a draft. -Barry