Feb. 10, 2005
11:03 p.m.
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:32:14 -0500, Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake@acm.org> wrote:
On Thursday 10 February 2005 14:44, Tim Peters wrote:
Well, then since that isn't ISO 8601 format, it would be nice to have a comment explaining why it's claiming to be anyway <0.5 wink>.
I've posted a note on the XML-RPC list about this. There doesn't seem to be anything that describes the range of what's accepted and produced by the various XML-RPC libraries, but I've not looked hard for it.
Is there any surprise here? =)