Le Wed, 29 May 2013 11:58:21 -0400, "R. David Murray" <rdmurray@bitdance.com> a écrit :
On Thu, 30 May 2013 00:59:02 +1000, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Brett Cannon <brett@python.org> wrote:
I am willing to compromise to module_to_initialize, module_to_init, or module_to_load. Pick one. =)
I see this as *really* similar to a database transaction, and those start with "session.begin()".
Could you tolerate "with begin_module_init(name) as m:"?
But for a transaction, it is 'with session', not 'with begin_session'.
or "with transaction.begin()", or "with transaction.commit_on_success()", depending on the API :-)
With 'begin_module_init' I would have no idea what 'm' was. With Brett's 'module_to_init' I have an intuitive idea about what 'm' is.
Agreed. Regards Antoine.