4 Jan
2022
4 Jan
'22
8:52 a.m.
On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 22:40:25 -0800 "Gregory P. Smith" <greg@krypto.org> wrote:
rerunning a mere few of those in --rigorous mode for more runs does not significantly improve the stddev so I'm not going to let that finish.
The one benchmark that is bigint-heavy is pidigits AFAIK, so you might want to re-run that one if you want a more rigorous confirmation that there is no regression.
my recommendation: proceed with removing 15-bit bignum digit support. 30-bit only future with simpler better code here we come.
Sounds reasonable to me as well. Regards Antoine.