On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 12:16 AM, Paul Moorep.firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
I believe the idea of having different names in 2.x and 3.x would likely cause too many problems for simple bdist_* installers of modules that use only the common 2.x/3.x language subset, so I'm also -1 on that idea.
That suits me too. I'm happy for the name to stay as it is.
While I'd rather like having an "egg"-free standard, it's a detail compared to the rest, so I'm 0+