9 May
2012
9 May
'12
9:50 a.m.
On May 09, 2012, at 08:51 AM, Eric Snow wrote:
The type for sys.implementation has slowly shifted from the original proposal. At this point it's settled into where I think it will stay, a custom type. I've covered the choice of type in the rationale section. However, there may be merit in not being so specific about the type. I'll give that some thought.
Right. See my previous follow up for what I think the PEP should say about the semantics of the type, without being so specific about the actual type. Cheers, -Barry