On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 9:24 AM, Serhiy Storchaka
17.07.18 18:48, Guido van Rossum пише:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:28 AM, Serhiy Storchaka
mailto:storchaka@gmail.com> wrote: Should not the assert statement introduce an implicit lexical scope for preventing leaking variables? I don't see why. As Chris said, side effects in asserts are nothing new and this PEP is not the one to do something about it.
This side effect is new. No other expressions that can be used in asserts leaked local variables before. The only exception is list comprehensions in Python 2, and this was fixed in Python 3.
We can't make the assignment expression itself creating its own scope, because this will invalidate its purpose. But the problem with assert ccould be solved by making assert creating a new lexical scope.
assert expr, msg
could be translated to
if __debug__ and not (lambda: expr)(): raise AssertionError(msg)
instead of
if __debug__ and not expr: raise AssertionError(msg)
I don't believe this "problem" needs to be solved. It seems to be you are seeking an excuse to reopen the acrimonious PEP 572 discussion. Please stop. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)