6 Jun
2014
6 Jun
'14
10:05 a.m.
Le 06/06/2014 07:00, R. David Murray a écrit :
I don't have any opinion on the workflow.
My understanding is that part of the purpose of the "provisional" designation is to allow faster evolution (read: fixing) of an API before the library becomes non-provisional. Thus I agree with Guido here, and will be doing something similar with at least one of the minor provisional email API features in 3.4.2 (unless I miss the cutoff again ... :(
I would personally distinguish API fixes (compatibility-breaking changes) from feature additions (new APIs).
Regards
Antoine.