On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 10:48 AM Mark Shannon wrote:
... For those of you aware of the recent releases of Cinder and Pyston, PEP 659 might look similar. It is similar, but I believe PEP 659 offers better interpreter performance and is more suitable to a collaborative, open-source development model.
I was curious what you meant by "is more suitable to a collaborative, open-source development model," but I didn't see it elaborated on in the PEP. If this is indeed a selling point, it might be worth mentioning that and saying why. --Chris
As always, comments and suggestions are welcome.
Cheers, Mark.
Links:
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0659/ https://github.com/facebookincubator/cinder https://github.com/pyston/pyston _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-leave@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/VKBV4X6Z... Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/