22 Jun
2002
22 Jun
'02
6:02 p.m.
"FP" == François Pinard
writes:
FP> Saying that PEP 292 rejects an idea because this idea would FP> require another PEP to be debated and accepted beforehand, and FP> than rushing the acceptance of PEP 292 as it stands, is FP> probably missing the point of the discussion. I don't think there's /any/ danger of rushing acceptance of PEP 292. It may not even be accepted at all. still-slogging-through-50-some-odd-messages-ly y'rs, -Barry