Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Le Tue, 2 Mar 2010 17:28:11 -0800, Raymond Hettinger
a écrit : -1 for several reasons.
1) We've advertised -3 as part of TheOneTrueWay(tm). It's a core part of our transition story, so we should keep that as clean/consistent as possible. Deprecating the -3 switch seems like shooting ourselves in the foot.
2) There is some chance that there will be a 2.8, so it isn't helpful to burn down our bridges.
That's my feeling too. I think introducing a Py3kDeprecationWarning subclass is the right thing to do.
Agreed for the reasons Raymond cited. As far as the subclass goes, I agree that's a good idea to allow people to readily detect whether they tripped over a normal deprecation or a Py3 only deprecation when running with -3 enabled. As far as naming goes, I agree with Py3kDeprecationWarning since the flag to enable them is called sys.py3kwarning. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ---------------------------------------------------------------