Mark Hammond wrote:
* Why arent Zope/PIL capable of being used as packages.
PIL can be used as a package ("from PIL import Image"), assuming that it's installed under a directory in your path. there's one pro- blem in 1.0b1, though: you have to explicitly import the file format handlers you need: import PIL.JpegImagePlugin import PIL.PngImagePlugin this has been fixed in 1.0 final.
* If they are (as I understand to be the case) why do people choose not to use them as such, or why do the authors not recommend this?
inertia, and compatibility concerns. we've decided that all official material related to PIL 1.0 will use the old syntax (and all 1.X releases will be possible to install using the PIL.pth approach). too many users out there... now, PIL 2.0 is a completely different thing...
* Is there a deficiency in the package scheme that makes it hard to use?
not that I'm aware... </F>