I believe a lot of people use https://pypi.org/project/cloudpickle/ thanks to its support for pickling functions. On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 4:56 AM haael <haael@interia.pl> wrote:
During some sophisticated pickling I noticed that method `__func__` objects are unpicklable, because they share the name with the bound method object itself.
``` from pickle import dumps
class A: @classmethod def b(cls): pass
print(A.b) # <bound method A.b of <class '__main__.A'>> print(A.b.__func__) # <function A.b at 0x7f5574570bf8>
dumps(A.b) # works dumps(A.b.__func__) # breaks # >Traceback (most recent call last): # > File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> # >_pickle.PicklingError: Can't pickle <function A.b at 0x7fd1d50d8bf8>: # >it's not the same object as __main__.A.b ```
The last call compains that global symbol "A.b" is not the same object as `A.b.__func__`.
Everything would work if the `__func__` objects had the suffix ".__func__" in their qualname.
Actually setting the qualname of the `__func__` object makes it picklable, but then the bound method object is unpicklable, as it inherits the name from the `__func__`. It would be good if they were separate.
This is an attempt at emulating the desired behavior:
``` from pickle import dumps
class A: pass
def c(cls): pass
A.c = lambda: c(A) A.c.__qualname__ = "A.c" A.c.__name__ = "c" A.c.__self__ = A A.c.__func__ = c A.c.__func__.__qualname__ = "A.c.__func__"
print(A.c) # <function A.c at 0x7f83ceabcbf8> print(A.c.__func__) # <function A.c.__func__ at 0x7f83ceabcb70>
dumps(A.c) # works dumps(A.c.__func__) # works ```
Can we make the `__func__` objects picklable this way?
haael
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-leave@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/N2J6MVLU... Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/