On 5/6/06, Talin <talin@acm.org> wrote:
I've updated PEP 3101 based on the feedback collected so far. [snip] Compound names are a sequence of simple names seperated by periods:
"My name is {0.name} :-\{\}".format(dict(name='Fred'))
Compound names can be used to access specific dictionary entries, array elements, or object attributes. In the above example, the '{0.name}' field refers to the dictionary entry 'name' within positional argument 0.
I'm still not a big fan of mixing together getitem-style access and getattribute-style access. That makes classes that support both ambiguous in this context. You either need to specify the order in which these are checked (e.g. attribute then item or item then attribute), or, preferably, you need to extend the syntax to allow getitem-style access too. Just to be clear, I'm not suggesting that you support anything more then items and attributes. So this is *not* a request to allow arbitrary expressions. In fact, the only use-case I see in the PEP needs only item access, not attribute access, so maybe you could drop attribute access? Can't you just extend the syntax for *only* item access? E.g. something like: "My name is {0[name]} :-\{\}".format(dict(name='Fred')) STeVe -- Grammar am for people who can't think for myself. --- Bucky Katt, Get Fuzzy