28 Aug
2012
28 Aug
'12
4:15 a.m.
Daniel Holth wrote:
I don't know of a tool that doesn't reliably ignore extra fields, but I will put you down as being in favor of an X- fields paragraph:
Extensions (X- Fields) ::::::::::::::::::::::
Metadata files can contain fields that are not part of the specification, called *extensions*. These fields start with with `X-`.
See RFC 6648 for why such X-fields may not be a good idea: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6648