On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 5:37 PM Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote:
On Wed, 02 May 2018 21:24:07 +0000 Brian Curtin <brian@python.org> wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 16:55 Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev < python-dev@python.org> wrote:
As https://bugs.python.org/issue33257 and https://bugs.python.org/issue33316 showed, Tkinter is broken, for both Py2 and Py3, with both threaded and non-threaded Tcl, since 2002 at least, and no-one gives a damn.
This seems to be a testament that very few people are actually interested in or are using it.
If that's so, there's no use keeping it in the standard library -- if anything, because there's not enough incentive and/or resources to support it. And to avoid screwing people (=me) up when they have the foolishness to think they can rely on it in their projects -- nowhere in the docs it is said that the module is only partly functional.
For the future, this is not how you communicate with the development mailing list of any open source software project. I would suggest reading https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ for some pointers on how
On Wed, 2 May 2018 23:28:22 +0200 Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote: people
typically behave around here in particular.
Perhaps it would be more constructive to address the OP's point than to play speech police.
To elaborate a bit: the OP, while angry, produced both a detailed analysis *and* a PR. It's normal to be angry when an advertised feature doesn't work and it makes you lose hours of work (or, even, forces you to a wholesale redesign). Producing a detailed analysis and a PR is more than most people will ever do.
It may be normal to be angry when something doesn't work the way it should, but analyzing and creating a PR aren't the gateway to normalizing this behavior. Sending thousands of people this type of email isn't how it works. To address their point: no, next topic.