On 13 Jul 2013, at 07:41, Terry Reedy tjreedy@udel.edu wrote:
On 7/13/2013 12:10 AM, Eric Snow wrote:
On Feb 27, 2013 4:31 AM, "Michael Foord" <fuzzyman@voidspace.org.uk
+1 PLY is capable and well tried-and-tested. We used it in Resolver
One to implement a pretty large grammar and it is (in my opinion) best of breed in the Python parser generator world. Being stable and widely used, with an "available maintainer", makes it an ideal candidate for standard library inclusion.
Is this still on the table?
Who is the maintainer and what is his opinion?
The maintainer is David Beazley and as far as I recall he has not expressed an opinion on this particular question. It would obviously need his agreement (and maintenance commitment) if it is to fly.
Michael
-- Terry Jan Reedy
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.u...
-- http://www.voidspace.org.uk/
May you do good and not evil May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others May you share freely, never taking more than you give. -- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html