"TW" == Thomas Wouters
writes:
>> That is highly, highly nasty. Sounds to me like there ought to >> be an emergency 2.1.1 patch made for this, bumping Thomas's >> work to 2.1.2 if necessary. TW> Why bump 'my work' ? I'm just reviewing patches checked into TW> the head. A fix for the above problems would fit in a patch TW> release very nicely, and a release is a release. Besides, TW> releasing 2.1.1 as 2.1 + dict fix would be a CVS TW> nightmare. Unless you propose to keep it out of CVS, Barry ? TW> :) Oh no! You know me, I like to release those maintenance releases early and often. :) Anyway, that's why /you're/ the 2.1.1 czar. >> And if we can trojan in the NAIPL (New And Improved Python >> License), I wouldn't mind. :) TW> I'll channel Guido by saying he wouldn't even allow us to ship TW> it with anything other than the PSF licence :) :) TW> Gee-I'd-almost-think-you-had-a-need-for-an-FSF-suffered-licence-ly TW> y'rs Where'd you get /that/ idea? :) -Barry