Guido van Rossum wrote:
From: Christian Tismer
I'd really like to look into that. Also I wouldn't worry too much about speed, since this is such a cool feature. It might even be a speedup in some cases which otherwise would need more complex handling.
May I have a look?
Sure!
(I've forwarded Christian the files per separate mail.)
I'm also interested in your opinion on how well thought-out and robust the patches are -- I've never found the time to do a good close reading of them.
Coming back from the stackless task with is finished now, I popped this task from my stack. I had a look and it seems well-thought and robust so far. To make a more trustable claim, I would need to build and test it. Is this still of interest, or should I drop it? The follow-ups in this thread indicated that the opinions about flexible namespaces were quite mixed. So, should I waste time in building and testing or better save it? chris -- Christian Tismer :^) mailto:tismer@appliedbiometrics.com Applied Biometrics GmbH : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's Kaiserin-Augusta-Allee 101 : *Starship* http://starship.python.net 10553 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net PGP Fingerprint E182 71C7 1A9D 66E9 9D15 D3CC D4D7 93E2 1FAE F6DF we're tired of banana software - shipped green, ripens at home