+1 on 'complete'.

If 'enum.unique()' means 'every value has at most one name', then perhaps `enum.complete()` can mean 'every value has at least one name'? Or is that not accurate?

Other suggestions: 'occupied', 'full', 'exhaustive'.

Barney

On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 00:02, Jeff Allen <ja.py@farowl.co.uk> wrote:
On 28/05/2021 04:24, Ethan Furman wrote:

The flags RED, GREEN, and BLUE are all canonical, while PURPLE and WHITE are aliases for certain flag combinations.  But what if we have something like:

    class Color(Flag):
        RED = 1            # 0001
        BLUE = 4           # 0100
        WHITE = 7          # 0111
...

So, like the enum.unique decorator that can be used when duplicate names should be an error, I'm adding a new decorator to verify that a Flag has no missing aliased values that can be used when the programmer thinks it's appropriate... but I have no idea what to call it.

Any nominations?

The propery you are looking for IIUC is that if a bit position is 1 in any member, then there is a member with only that bit set. I am seeing these members as sets of elements (bit positions) and therefore you want optionally to ensure that your enumeration has a name for every singleton set, into which any member could be analysed.

Words like "basis", "complete", "analytic", or "indicator" (as in indicator function) come to mind. I find "singletonian" attractive, but no-one will know what it means, and I just made it up.

Jeff

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-leave@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/7VN5Z5FSN3CH33KKQELX63L7JW6WEB2L/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/