"M.-A. Lemburg" wrote:
(a great tool BTW, thanks Tim; I noticed that it leaks memory badly though).
Which Python? Which OS? How do you know? What were you running it over?
That's Python 1.5 on Linux2. I let the script run over a large lib directory and my projects directory. In the projects directory the script consumed as much as 240MB of process size.
Using 1.5.2 under Win95, according to wintop, & over the whole CVS tree, the total (code + data) virtual memory allocated to it peaked at about 2Mb a few seconds into the run, and actually decreased as time went on. So, akin to the bound method multi-argument append problem, the "checkappend leak problem" is something I simply have no reason to believe <wink>. Check your claim again? checkappend.py itself obviously creates no cycles or holds on to any state across files, so if you're seeing a leak it must be a bug in some other part of the version of Python + std libraries you're using. Maybe a new 1.6 bug? Something you did while adding Unicode? Etc. Tell us what you were running.
I'll try the same thing again using Python1.5.2 and the CVS version.
Using the Unicode patched CVS version there's no leak anymore. Couldn't find a 1.5.2 version on my machine... I'll build one later. -- Marc-Andre Lemburg ______________________________________________________________________ Business: http://www.lemburg.com/ Python Pages: http://www.lemburg.com/python/