[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 505 (None-aware operators) for Python 3.11

Steve Dower wrote:

Okay, I'll let myself get sucked into responding ONE TIME, but only because you gave me such a nice API to work with :)

This actually pushed me hard towards adding the null-aware operators. I agree that the named-function approach Paul suggests is better. I admit that there are times when a comprehensive model is good, and that if the DB schema is automatically generated, it should look something like this. But this is long enough that I would be unhappy if it were what I had to read to understand the database in the first place. (Yes, I know Java beans are pretty widely tolerated, but ... that doesn't make longer code desirable.)