Dec. 8, 2006
4:37 p.m.
On 8 Dec 2006, at 16:38, Josiah Carlson wrote:
My statement in the email you replied to above was to say that if we wanted it to return a group, then we could include subsequent .group (0) with the same semantics as the original match object.
And my reply was simply to point out that that's not workable.
At this point it doesn't matter, Frederik will produce what he wants to produce, and I'm sure most of us will be happy with the outcome. Those that are unhappy will need to write their own patch or deal with being unhappy.
I believe I've already conceded that twice. Kind regards, Alastair. -- http://alastairs-place.net