15 Oct
2004
15 Oct
'04
1:40 p.m.
Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 00:36, Anthony Baxter wrote:
I'm extremely unconvinced that the semantics of "-m package" or "-m package.module" are suitably well thought out to see it in b1.
If a single compelling way of making it work can be seen in the next week, _maybe_ we could sneak it into b2, but I'm really not hopeful.
Okay, based on the discussions so far, I'm going to have to agree. While I do think it's a very useful feature, it's more important to do it right than to do it right now. Which means it should probably go through the full PEP treatment.
+1 from me. -Brett