On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> wrote:
Generally speaking, deferring something to Python 4 means "never".

Does that mean your aversion to double digit version numbers (i.e. 3.10) is gone or you expect to freeze Python in carbonite by then?

-Brett
 

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:06 AM, R. David Murray <rdmurray@bitdance.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:14:26 +0000, Paul Moore <p.f.moore@gmail.com> wrote:
>> BTW, I assume that the intention is that both cffi and ctypes remain
>> available indefinitely? Nobody's looking to deprecate ctypes?
>
> I would expect that ctypes would be deprecated eventually simply because
> there aren't very many people interested in maintaining it, and probably
> fewer if cffi is accepted.  That said, I would not expect it to leave
> the stdlib until either the bit rot was so bad it wouldn't be worth
> shipping it, or (more likely) we reach Python4 and decide at that time
> that it is time for it to go.
>
> Of course, this is just me talking, we only have a *very* vague "sense of
> the house" for what Python4 means at this point :)
>
> --David
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org



--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)