28 Sep
2012
28 Sep
'12
9:52 p.m.
On 29 September 2012 07:50, Tim Delaney
On 29 September 2012 06:51, Paul Moore
wrote: Wow! I had no idea cdecimal was that close in speed to float. That's seriously impressive.
If those numbers are similar in other benchmarks, would it be accurate and/or reasonable to include a statement along the lines of:
"comparable to float performance - usually no more than 3x for calculations within the range of numbers covered by float"
or is there not enough evidence to conclude that?
Substitute suitable factor for 3x.
Obviously
And I meant to say congratulations - that's a really impressive result. Oh-oh. The PSU (which does not exist) has found me. I must hi Tim Delaney