-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Jan 3, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
1. I think that a patch can not e.g. capture a moved, renamed or deleted file. Further, it can not handle e.g. things like the executable bit or similar things that SVN otherwise does manage. That is what makes a patch only partially suitable.
Bazaar bundles handle moved, renamed and deleted files and directories, afaik. Executable bits and other file metadata are harder because such properties are OS specific, and Bazaar tries to be OS agnostic.
2. You don't checkout anew. You simply switch ("svn switch") your existing working copy to the branch which just pulls the differences and merges them into your existing working copy. Or, you could merge the changes on a branch ("svn merge") into your working copy.
I know that many VCSs support this style of working, but this just doesn't fit my brain. I much prefer separate working trees, each with its own feature or fix. - -Barry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBSV+ymnEjvBPtnXfVAQIDKgQArzTiPmBZnrVBnfrn4kfIJ/21cT+RVCsI S9rtIrMRtxAETIeA0ko/9zPLatktYft8hpK77IBo2f1ZSs9vpGRZbm30j4OtQOAR /A/1hr6yGCNzc0OtbHoB7OoJ+1+0ORv+otmUIXJYWTiIOhG3y6oj1gWYkmwhYJRc 87333i8VIj0= =azL0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----