"GvR" == Guido van Rossum firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
>> I tend toward the more conservative, especially with changes >> that touch lots of .c files, so I'd say -1. But it looks from >> the patch dialog that Guido's already approved of this in >> principle, so I'll revise that to a -0.
GvR> I'm not at all sure on whether this should be incorporated GvR> into 2.2. I approve it (or something like it) for 2.3; for GvR> 2.2, I'm hesitant but if Jack thinks it's needed for MacOS, GvR> and it's off by default, and a thorough code review shows no GvR> problems with it as long as it's off, I would be OK with it. GvR> In other words, you're the release manager; it's your call.
Sounds good. I'll reserve judgement for now.