Feb. 16, 2010
11:09 p.m.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Mark Dickinson <dickinsm@gmail.com> wrote:
and particularly the discussion on page 8 that starts "Were there no way to get rid of NaNs ...". I don't think it covers hypot, but the
Whoops. I should have reread that article myself. The behaviour of hypot *is* mentioned, on page 7. Mark