Thanks for bring attention to these PRs, Brandt! I think the second one
should be particularly uncontroversial, seeing as it's just applying PEP
409 (raise from None) to an existing exception in an argparse unit test to
clean up some unhelpful context clutter in the traceback.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:41 PM Brandt Bucher
Hi everybody!
I've found a handful of trivial PRs from new contributors that have gone un-core-reviewed since November. CLAs are signed, tests are passing, and I've verified the quality and correctness of each one.
If anybody has a few spare minutes to merge these, I know that it would make the authors very happy! :)
Clarify numeric padding behaviour in string formatting: - A helpful doc addition (just a few words). - https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/17036
argparse unittest tracebacks are confusing if an error is raised when not expected: - This just changes a "raise" to a "raise from None" in the argparse unit test machinery. - https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/17120
Reuse identifier of PREDICT macros as PREDICT_ID: - Unifies some shared naming logic in the ceval prediction macros (don't worry, it's simple). - https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/17155/files
Thanks.
Brandt _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-leave@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/46U2H5U2... Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/