data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/227ad/227ad844da34915e2d53d651f1d0f394b1fcc61b" alt=""
On 4/15/2013 4:21 PM, Larry Hastings wrote:
On 04/15/2013 09:31 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
Would it make sense to think about adding this in the scope of the argument clinic work, or is it too unrelated? This seems like a commonly needed thing for large parts of the stdlib (where the C accelerator overrides Python code).
From my perspective, the C accelerator doesn't override the Python code; the Python code is in charge, and elects to call the C accelerator.
To answer your question, Clinic could help but I think it'd kind of suck. We'd have to use Clinic to preprocess the .py file and copy the docstring there, which would mean slurping in the C file. Clumsy but workable. We can talk about it once I finish the revised implementation, which should make processes like this much easier.
Since Clinic is mostly aimed at making C usage work with python, isn't the above backwards? Wouldn't it be better to have Clinic slurp in the Python code to find the docstrings, and then put them in the C code? Then no need to preprocess the python file, just read it to obtain the docstrings. You are already preprocessing the C code...